tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4342651855089974722.post5543948159425381266..comments2023-10-22T07:09:40.782-04:00Comments on Old: Reason's commenters put Reason contributers to shameStephen Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12118017106106571684noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4342651855089974722.post-83262442563220482612008-11-16T02:41:00.000-05:002008-11-16T02:41:00.000-05:00Also their viewpoint is the most distant from true...Also their viewpoint is the most distant from true Libertarian, or free-market ideals.<BR/><BR/>Regulations aren't the problem and they are the problem. The crux is when money backs one method or the other or limits choice. We'll never see free markets at work in zoning or transportation again in this country ( I dread ). But listening to them we just get more skewed results than we should. <BR/><BR/>What we need is balance that the markets would provide but cannot because of subsidies and other interference. Unfortunately that means finding zoning rules and regulations that balance out things but also a way to balance the subsidies funding transport modes. Without some balance we'll keep getting highly slanted sprawl verus urban growth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4342651855089974722.post-38138567977653384052008-11-04T19:41:00.000-05:002008-11-04T19:41:00.000-05:00Yes. These Cox-O'Tool people are paid to say that ...Yes. These Cox-O'Tool people are paid to say that single-fam detached is what everyone wants! No, REALLY! <BR/><BR/>This is, of course, false. Their consternation is because their POV is false.<BR/><BR/>DSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com